Document processing
Bills of lading, proof-of-delivery scans, customs declarations, CMRs: extracted, validated, and filed. The messy 30% that off-the-shelf OCR drops gets routed to a human, not lost.
Route optimization, document processing, inventory agents, inbound order handling. Built on your stack, not a vendor SaaS. We deploy, document, and hand off. Your team runs it.
Logistics operations run on documents, exceptions, and time-sensitive decisions. These are the six areas where AI earns its keep fastest. Each one is a workflow we have shipped.
Bills of lading, proof-of-delivery scans, customs declarations, CMRs: extracted, validated, and filed. The messy 30% that off-the-shelf OCR drops gets routed to a human, not lost.
Shipment delays, weight discrepancies, missing signatures, incomplete customs data. The AI reviews every record and escalates only what needs a human decision. No more end-of-day inbox triage.
Pull live capacity, fuel cost, and delivery-window data from your TMS. Suggest optimal carrier-lane pairings. Keep a human in the final approval seat.
Monitor SKU velocity, flag reorder thresholds, draft purchase orders for review. Works against your WMS or ERP. No rip-and-replace required.
Customer order emails, carrier rate requests, booking confirmations. Classified, extracted, and routed to the right system in seconds. Replies drafted for a human to send.
Automated status-update drafts, shortage notifications, and detention-charge disputes. The AI writes. Your ops team approves and sends.
Looking for AI document processing specifically? See the dedicated page or explore AI workflow automation for cross-functional builds.
A mid-market logistics SaaS had a 14-person manual review queue for incoming shipping documents: bills of lading, customs forms, proof-of-delivery scans. Days-long backlog. Enterprise clients complaining. Standard OCR vendors could handle the clean 70%. The messy 30% bounced back to humans every time. We built an LLM pipeline that handles the hard cases and flags only the genuinely ambiguous records for a 3-person exception team. The queue cleared in week one.
We'd written the budget for a vendor SaaS. They convinced us to spend a third of that on a prototype first. The prototype showed us the vendors couldn't handle our messy 30%, and gave us a system that could. Eighteen months in, it's still running.
VP Engineering, logistics SaaS
Four phases. Humans in the loop at every step. Nothing ships without a working prototype first.
We spend a week in your actual workflows: your TMS, your email queues, your review queues. We find the highest-volume, lowest-tolerance-for-error bottlenecks. Most teams have one costing 20+ person-hours a week.
You get a prioritized build list with effort, timeline, and expected outcome per item. We flag the ones where AI is not the right answer. Sometimes a process fix or a cheaper tool gets you there.
Fixed scope, capped budget. A 3-week prototype proves it works on your real documents before the production build starts. No surprises.
Full documentation, an eval harness, a runbook, and a training session. Your team can maintain it without us. Humans stay in the loop on every exception path.
Single-workflow logistics builds typically run in the same range as our standard workflow automation. Capped budget. A prototype phase before any production commitment comes first.
Most single-workflow builds run $10,000-$30,000. We quote a budget cap before we start, bill against actual work, and never exceed the cap without your written sign-off. Logistics document pipelines have a 3-week prototype phase built in. You see it working on your real documents before we build for production.
Need a broader look at options? See full workflow automation pricing
Tell us where your team is losing the most time. We'll tell you whether AI is the right fix and what it would take to build.